User talk:IvanScrooge98

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, IvanScrooge98!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Selena Gomez VMA 2015.jpg

File:Selena Gomez VMA 2015.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Selena Gomez VMA 2015.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Livelikemusic (talk) 17:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Santhià-Stemma.png

File:Santhià-Stemma.png has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Images from www.araldicacivica.it This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
		Dear IvanScrooge98, Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your sounds for the FS Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 20:32, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Che Guevara

Che Guevara was a murderer and a terrorist. I don't understand why you remove those categories Gampe (talk) 17:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

I explained it in my latest edit summary. Did you even read it? If you are so eager to label him, please place those categories at Category:Che Guevara, not under a picture. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 17:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by IvanScrooge98 This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Adalah Justice Project white logo.png

And also:

• File:Adalah Justice Project black logo.png

Yours sincerely, 0x0a (talk) 12:41, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Issam Alnajjar (cropped).jpg

File:Issam Alnajjar (cropped).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

cropped image of a non free and deteled file; see File:Issam Alnajjar.jpg

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

---

France3c0 (talk) 07:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Alla fine, come previsto, la persona che aveva caricato il file originale non si è nemmeno accorta degli avvisi. Ottimo. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Image

I mean that of Radio Bruno, not that of the photo shoot. The image of Radio Bruno is much better. 37.159.55.190 00:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

No. A YouTube screenshot can never be “much better” than a professional photographic portrait. Please try to make some sense. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 00:53, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

@IvanScrooge98 No it's not good, the image is of a photo shoot that also comes out among Instagram stories. The one in the Radio Bruno interview is better. 37.159.55.190 00:58, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

What? What has Instagram to do with this? That is a professional image, period. Find an actual argument before restoring the screenshot or I’ll report you for edit warring. Regards. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 01:00, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

@IvanScrooge98 It is a copyright image. If you put it on Google it comes out immediately, so it's not good. Better that of the Radio Bruno interview. 37.159.55.190 01:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Gosh. It’s on Commons because the author uploaded it—or at least someone who claims to be. Kindly read the file information page. And next time please explain the issue on the first occasion instead of forcing others to beg for a clarification. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 01:08, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

@IvanScrooge98 it is possible to upload some other version of the Radio Bruno interview. 37.159.55.190 01:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

I know that. I may do this tomorrow or in the next few days, but as long as the better image is on Commons, there’s no further need for screenshots. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 01:18, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

@IvanScrooge98 The image of the photo shoot is not convincing at all, especially for the license inserted, which as usually happens with badly inserted images, are deleted after a certain period. For this reason there are doubts, as the image was taken from social media and usually those taken from there are often deleted. One could insert the image of the interview video, as it is also supported by the source. 37.159.55.190 01:31, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

The image of the photo shoot was taken from here (https://www.instagram.com/share/p/BAbwgkoChc), then not even the license used is convincing. It is not suitable as a source, which is why a YouTube image is better than an interview. 37.159.55.190 01:45, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

@IvanScrooge98 Hello, in these days a user has raised a discussion about the images of the participants of the Sanremo Festival, regarding the logo on the microphones and defining it as a "promotion", which is not at all. In addition, such images were also used for the participants of previous editions and the meaning of the discussion is not understood. Logos or crests are also used by actors, footballers and singers and all this is not called a "promotion". This is just a user annoyance that some images bother you. If you'd like to participate to the discussion, you can do it whenever you want. 83.225.11.230 23:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Sarah Toscano 2025 (cropped).jpg

File:Sarah Toscano 2025 (cropped).jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/CANNOTFINDTHESUBPAGE This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 37.159.49.237.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 02:21, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Sarah Toscano 2025 (cropped).jpg

File:Sarah Toscano 2025 (cropped).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

non free file; see https://www.instagram.com/p/DF7tW_GsjwB/?igsh=QkJQZkNLUVpiNw%3D%3D

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

---

France3c0 (talk) 07:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Rajieen YouTube logo.jpg

File:Rajieen YouTube logo.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rajieen YouTube logo.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:46, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Copyright violation templates

Let an admin decide if the image violates copyright. Thanks. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 17:53, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

If you put those templates, someone might delete the files in a short time without even reading the deletion discussion. Since a discussion is open, that template is out of place. Regards. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 19:04, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

IvanScrooge98, I opened a noticeboard discussion about Counterfeit Purses's behavior here: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Repeatedly overwriting deletion requests with speedy deletions. Einsof (talk) 19:13, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Zohran for Mayor.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Zohran for Mayor.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Didym (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Luigi Mangione as Jesus on a sticker.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Luigi Mangione as Jesus on a sticker.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Counterfeit Purses (talk) 03:44, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Zohran for Mayor.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Zohran for Mayor.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Counterfeit Purses (talk) 03:46, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Zohran for Mayor.jpg

Let's discuss this before it leads to further arguments.

@Didym tagged the file as a derivative work. You removed the tag saying that the people who made the poster "...doesn't seem to claim any rights to them (see internet)". The poster itself is a derivative work of the photo used in the poster. The photo would have to have a free license for this to be allowed on Commons. It doesn't matter what the people who made the poster say if they aren't the ones who hold the copyright of the photo. So I tagged it again as a derivative work.

Now you've identified the source image and said " there, found it. I guess you'll be happy to delete it now". It's not freely licensed, so it can't stay on Commons. That doesn't make me happy, it's just following COM:SCOPE. If you upload images that aren't freely licensed, they are going to get deleted, whether it's me asking for the deletion or someone else. Don't make it personal. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

You seem to be intent on pointlessly edit warring. The image isn't a poster of New York City, so the category doesn't apply. I removed the category in case the image doesn't get deleted. Since you've obviously seen my message here, I'm going to ask for the image to be deleted as a copyright violation. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 00:17, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Zohran for Mayor.jpg

File:Zohran for Mayor.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo used on poster is not free licensed CQ Roll Calll image Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Counterfeit Purses (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Fairouz en concert à Bercy 1988. (cropped).jpg

File:Fairouz en concert à Bercy 1988. (cropped).jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fairouz en concert à Bercy 1988. (cropped).jp… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

웃OO 08:17, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Mason Thames Black Phone 2 premiere (2025).jpg

File:Mason Thames Black Phone 2 premiere (2025).jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mason Thames Black Phone 2 premiere (2025).jp… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Counterfeit Purses (talk) 18:07, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Folake Olowofoyeku 2023.jpg

File:Folake Olowofoyeku 2023.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Folake Olowofoyeku 2023.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Counterfeit Purses (talk) 18:14, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Macron-et-Fairouz.jpg

File:Macron-et-Fairouz.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Macron-et-Fairouz.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Counterfeit Purses (talk) 18:17, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Yazan Al-Bawwab 2021.jpg

File:Yazan Al-Bawwab 2021.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Cropped from a screenshot of a YouTube video. Copyright for the video belongs to CanarTV, not the uploader of a copy wrongly marked as CC. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Counterfeit Purses (talk) 18:43, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Massironi Imparato Franzoni - Il malloppo (2025).webp

File:Massironi Imparato Franzoni - Il malloppo (2025).webp has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Massironi Imparato Franzoni - Il malloppo (20… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Counterfeit Purses (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Gianluca Gazzoli - Sanremo Giovani 2025 (cropped).jpg

File:Gianluca Gazzoli - Sanremo Giovani 2025 (cropped).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Image in copyright (https://www.instagram.com/p/DP4WmFAjOmt/)) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : ~2026-33243-8.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 01:49, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Luigi Mangione Radical Sticker in Minneapolis.jpg

File:Luigi Mangione Radical Sticker in Minneapolis.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luigi Mangione Radical Sticker in Minneapolis… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– Howardcorn33 (💬) 22:34, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

File tagging File:Mariam Battistelli.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mariam Battistelli.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

0x0a (talk) 18:09, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

I have already asked the copyright holder to send a confirmation, apparently they haven’t done it yet. I’ll ask them again. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 19:18, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

A little help restoring deleted info

Hello, So I had added some thoroughly cited information to a few language pages while editing admittedly as a sock, and now I am currently blocked. And as a result a couple users had hounded my account and edits, and sadly removed all of the info that I added to the following pages. Could you possibly restore the info I added to the pages at least? I truly want to display this cited info for the public, at least. I am doing this for the viewers, and the readers, and especially indigenous peoples trying to learn their forgotten tongue. I also deeply care about the rights of indigenous peoples across the world, and this is why that info was added. The following pages and their revisions are listed here to undo.

Warrwa lanugage; Ngadjuri language; Arutani language; Gkuthaarn language; Mbara-Yanga language; Yanda language; Yalarnnga language

If you could undo all of these deletions, that would be incredibly helpful. Thanks Fdom5997 (talk) 03:18, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

I’m pretty sure I can’t do it all as it would qualify as proxying, but I can review and restore the parts that are sourced. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 10:39, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

All of them are sourced. And they were wrongfully deleted. If you could maybe have them reviewed before doing so, that would be great. I'll list them here ([1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]) Fdom5997 (talk) 21:40, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Since you seem in good faith and your contributions earnest, I restored them all. Please try to avoid trouble because it’s a pity that improvements go lost over account irregularities. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 00:10, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Will do! Thank you very much!! Fdom5997 (talk) 00:18, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

@IvanScrooge98 Oh and one more thing, could you revert this Hindustani phonology revision? The chart was disrupted by some user who didn’t even use a source. Fdom5997 (talk) 07:37, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

@IvanScrooge98 thanks for the Hindustani one! Although there’s just one more revision that should be rv’d (since the rv’d info was based on the main source used) from the Secoya language, here Fdom5997 (talk) 20:10, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Eleanore Bouw-Spies.jpg

File:Eleanore Bouw-Spies.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The picture is originally from this page. https://www.parliament.gov.za/person-details/5301 Pictures of South African MPs are copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Uhm. I read that page, too, before starting to upload pictures. It says that the content may be copyrighted, but this as well as other pictures appear on a parallel website of the National Assembly which says that the content is freely licensed. This is why I went on with the upload. IvanScrooge98 (talk) 15:35, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Don't remove templates. You have an option to contest the speedy deletion. Re-read the page on the Parliament of South Africa, which clearly says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes." Parliamentary Monitoring Group is an independent NGO not affiliated with the Parliament of South Africa. Lefcentreright (talk) 17:15, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Priscilla Tozama Mantashe.jpg

File:Priscilla Tozama Mantashe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture is originally from the Parliament of South Africa website https://www.parliament.gov.za/press-releases/media-statement-trade-and-industry-committee-chairperson-sends-condolences-mantashe-family. Picture is copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer which says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes." Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 20:23, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Sharome van Schalkwyk.jpg

File:Sharome van Schalkwyk.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture is originally from the Parliament of South Africa website https://web.archive.org/web/20231014043823mp_/https://www.parliament.gov.za/person-details/526. Picture is copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer which says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes.” Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 20:31, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Liezl van der Merwe.jpg

File:Liezl van der Merwe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture is originally from the Parliament of South Africa website https://www.parliament.gov.za/person-details/5238. Picture is copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer which says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes.” Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 20:33, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:David Mahlobo.jpg

File:David Mahlobo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture is originally from the Parliament of South Africa website https://www.parliament.gov.za/person-details/6007. Picture is copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer which says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes.” Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 20:35, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Visvin Reddy.jpg

File:Visvin Reddy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture is originally from the Parliament of South Africa website https://www.parliament.gov.za/person-details/6007. Picture is copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer which says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes.” Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 20:36, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Stanley Ramaila.jpg

File:Stanley Ramaila.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture is originally from the Parliament of South Africa website https://www.parliament.gov.za/person-details/5413. Picture is copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer which says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes.” Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 20:37, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Stephen Moore (South Africa).jpg

File:Stephen Moore (South Africa).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture is originally from the Parliament of South Africa website https://www.parliament.gov.za/person-details/5777. Picture is copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer which says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes.” Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 20:39, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Pemmy Majodina official.jpg

File:Pemmy Majodina official.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture is originally from the Parliament of South Africa website https://www.parliament.gov.za/person-details/5997. Picture is copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer which says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes.” Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 20:41, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Sello Dithebe.jpg

File:Sello Dithebe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture is originally from the Parliament of South Africa website https://www.parliament.gov.za/person-details/5594. Picture is copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer which says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes.” Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Malebo Kobe.jpg

File:Malebo Kobe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture is originally from the Parliament of South Africa website https://www.parliament.gov.za/person-details/5594. Picture is copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer which says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes.” Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 20:44, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Betty Kegakilwe.jpg

File:Betty Kegakilwe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture is originally from the Parliament of South Africa website https://www.parliament.gov.za/person-details/5843. Picture is copyrighted as per https://www.parliament.gov.za/disclaimer which says: "Users may view, copy, download to a local drive, print and distribute the content of this website, or any part thereof for informational or reference purposes only and for non-commercial purposes.” Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lefcentreright (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2026 (UTC)